Comments on: Fallen Idols: Tossing Johnnie Under the Bus http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132 Living close enough to the edge to matter... Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:12:37 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Fishing The Abyss http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-9575 Fishing The Abyss Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:54:41 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-9575 [...] Shawn Doe on Fallen Idols: Tossing Johnnie Under the Bus [...] [...] Shawn Doe on Fallen Idols: Tossing Johnnie Under the Bus [...]

]]> By: Shawn Doe http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-9078 Shawn Doe Sun, 30 Sep 2007 10:18:56 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-9078 I am so tired of all this. Every single one of these men have been reading the same bible. Yet all three differ on what it is they believe about the book. So what essential things do I need to believe and do to be saved? This is pissing me off. I am so tired of these intellectuals beating each other up and dividing the saints. PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP! I am so tired of all this. Every single one of these men have been reading the same bible. Yet all three differ on what it is they believe about the book. So what essential things do I need to believe and do to be saved? This is pissing me off. I am so tired of these intellectuals beating each other up and dividing the saints. PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP!

]]> By: CRN.Info and Analysis http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-7541 CRN.Info and Analysis Wed, 15 Aug 2007 18:51:24 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-7541 [...] This is significantly different than most flavors of premillenial eschatology, which is much more favorable to the Calvinist worldview (though not universally so), which sees the Bible as independent from its writers and the time in which it was written. This view is in alingment with the (Ironically, this pre-mil view of eschatology forces those who hold it to fudge the issue of inerrancy of the Bible when dealing with Daniel’s 70 weeks via a number of shell games, but that’s another long, sore subject, as well.) [...] [...] This is significantly different than most flavors of premillenial eschatology, which is much more favorable to the Calvinist worldview (though not universally so), which sees the Bible as independent from its writers and the time in which it was written. This view is in alingment with the (Ironically, this pre-mil view of eschatology forces those who hold it to fudge the issue of inerrancy of the Bible when dealing with Daniel’s 70 weeks via a number of shell games, but that’s another long, sore subject, as well.) [...]

]]> By: Bob Jones http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-6148 Bob Jones Fri, 06 Jul 2007 04:04:02 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-6148 I sent you the drash of Matthew's eschatology. I sent you the drash of Matthew’s eschatology.

]]> By: Henry Frueh http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-1704 Henry Frueh Wed, 04 Apr 2007 12:48:20 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-1704 Just when I thought I had figured out all the nuances of the reformed camp I realize I still have a long way to go. I though that eschatology was used of God to stimulate preparation of the believer, a deeper seeking of the Word, and a catalyst to anticipate the glorious coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Then I saw in several reformed blogs that MacArthur was now considered a compromiser. Wow. Once you are trained to devour others you have a difficult time stopping even when the devouree is from your own camp. The Hew Testament warned of mass feeding frenzies which would devour all of us. Just when I thought I had figured out all the nuances of the reformed camp I realize I still have a long way to go. I though that eschatology was used of God to stimulate preparation of the believer, a deeper seeking of the Word, and a catalyst to anticipate the glorious coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Then I saw in several reformed blogs that MacArthur was now considered a compromiser. Wow.

Once you are trained to devour others you have a difficult time stopping even when the devouree is from your own camp. The Hew Testament warned of mass feeding frenzies which would devour all of us.

]]> By: Musings from Two-Sheds Gomer http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-1336 Musings from Two-Sheds Gomer Sat, 31 Mar 2007 04:20:33 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-1336 [...] I have a great deal of respect for Dr MacArthur. I’ve read some of his books and often listen to his teaching on the radio. But I had more respect 6 months ago. While I’m not ready to throw him under the bus, like many of those who disagree with his eschatology have done recently, I’m starting to fear that “over-generalization” may be becoming his middle name. [...] [...] I have a great deal of respect for Dr MacArthur. I’ve read some of his books and often listen to his teaching on the radio. But I had more respect 6 months ago. While I’m not ready to throw him under the bus, like many of those who disagree with his eschatology have done recently, I’m starting to fear that “over-generalization” may be becoming his middle name. [...]

]]> By: gib http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-983 gib Thu, 22 Mar 2007 19:24:37 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-983 Great points, I really enjoy your blog. Keep it up! Great points, I really enjoy your blog. Keep it up!

]]> By: CRN.Info and Analysis http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/132/comment-page-1#comment-929 CRN.Info and Analysis Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:10:26 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=132#comment-929 [...] Hypocrisy 1: Rob Bell is not, nor has ever claimed to be “emergent” or “emerging” - he has purposely on MANY occasions eschewed the label. This doesn’t seem to stop Ken & Company from taking every horror story from the far left of the Emergent/Emerging movement and then tying it back to Bell in some fashion. (I blogged more about this on my own site here.) Hypocrisy 2: In Slice 2.0 today, they posted an article critical of an upcoming Beth Moore conference. The prize leading quote: As the title of their headline points out, “15,000 women at $55 each…you do the math!” [...] [...] Hypocrisy 1: Rob Bell is not, nor has ever claimed to be “emergent” or “emerging” – he has purposely on MANY occasions eschewed the label. This doesn’t seem to stop Ken & Company from taking every horror story from the far left of the Emergent/Emerging movement and then tying it back to Bell in some fashion. (I blogged more about this on my own site here.) Hypocrisy 2: In Slice 2.0 today, they posted an article critical of an upcoming Beth Moore conference. The prize leading quote: As the title of their headline points out, “15,000 women at $55 each…you do the math!” [...]

]]>