Comments on: An Arsonist’s Lesson on Fire Safety http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/42 Living close enough to the edge to matter... Mon, 30 Jan 2012 16:41:31 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Sliced Laodicea » An Arsonist’s Lesson on Fire Safety http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/42/comment-page-1#comment-357 Sliced Laodicea » An Arsonist’s Lesson on Fire Safety Fri, 22 Dec 2006 07:33:17 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=42#comment-357 [...] Source: Fishing the Abyss [...] [...] Source: Fishing the Abyss [...]

]]> By: Chris L. http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/42/comment-page-1#comment-93 Chris L. Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:32:29 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=42#comment-93 I love this, brendt! I quoted you over <a href="http://www.verumserum.com/?p=587" rel="nofollow">here</a>, as I liked it so much. Grace & peace, Chris I love this, brendt! I quoted you over here, as I liked it so much.

Grace & peace,

Chris

]]> By: brendt http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/archives/42/comment-page-1#comment-92 brendt Sat, 23 Sep 2006 23:39:51 +0000 http://www.fishingtheabyss.com/?p=42#comment-92 There's too many things to point out and agree with, so I'll just focus on one part of one article that you linked to. <a href="http://www.sliceoflaodicea.com/archives/2006/09/regarding_comme.php" rel="nofollow">Ingrid stated</a> in response to some of her critics who keep coming back for more Slice despite it being repulsive: <blockquote> Well, if the site is indeed as twisted and sick as you say, perhaps you should spend your time more profitably on something you find edifying. I'm not responsible for your own voyeuristic tendencies. </blockquote> So I guess the moral here would be that if you <i>read</i> a blog that you often find objectionable, then it's "voyeuristic". But if you <i>write</i> a blog whose ENTIRE EXISTENCE AND MISSION is reliant upon searching the church for things you find objectionable, then it's a "ministry". I'm so glad she cleared that up. There’s too many things to point out and agree with, so I’ll just focus on one part of one article that you linked to. Ingrid stated in response to some of her critics who keep coming back for more Slice despite it being repulsive:

Well, if the site is indeed as twisted and sick as you say, perhaps you should spend your time more profitably on something you find edifying. I’m not responsible for your own voyeuristic tendencies.

So I guess the moral here would be that if you read a blog that you often find objectionable, then it’s “voyeuristic”. But if you write a blog whose ENTIRE EXISTENCE AND MISSION is reliant upon searching the church for things you find objectionable, then it’s a “ministry”.

I’m so glad she cleared that up.

]]>